Prediction of Hazem Naow [574th] vs Henry Searle [401st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W L L
Form
W W W L W L L W W LHead To Head: Naow 1 - 0 Searle
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Searle winning 0. The last match between Naow and Searle was at the Cassis Challenger, 03-09-2024, First, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hazem Naow | 1 |
| Henry Searle | 0 |
| Naow | Stats | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (10-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 574 | Ranking | 401 |
| 299 | Highest Rank | 389 |
| 25 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (170-97) | Career Total W/L | 51% (44-43) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,970 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Henry Searle
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:47:50 | Average Match Time | 1:47:50 |
| 71% (57/80) | 1st Serve % | 55% (42/76) |
| 70% (40/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (29/42) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (12/34) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 46% (35/76) | Return Points Win % | 34% (27/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hazem Naow vs Henry Searle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Searle
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 43.17% of points on their second serve, while Searle has won 48.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 42.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Searle has won 44.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.22% and 24.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 63.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Searle has saved 63.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Searle winning 53.06% (W/L 26/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 75/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 60/ 44). Searle has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 21/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15), where as Searle has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times and Searle being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Searle winning 0. The last match between Naow and Searle was at the Cassis Challenger, 03-09-2024, First, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Searle have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Searle 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 1, and Searle 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.68 while Searle has played against players with an average rank of 217.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Searle has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 14.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Searle has converted 28.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Hazem Naow vs Henry Searle Best Odds For The Match
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Hazem Naow
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Hazem Naow
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
80 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
50 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Matisse Bobichon
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hazem Naow
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mika Brunold
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yaroslav Demin
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Henry Searle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Milos Karol
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Henry Searle
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Henry Searle
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Tom Hands
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Toby Martin
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Hamish Stewart
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
6
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Gleb Sakharov
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Naow vs Searle?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Naow Vs Searle is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (170/97) | Win/Loss | 51% (44/43) |
| 62% (374/233) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (103/98) |
| 54% (3061/2561) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1007/983) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.5 |
| 385 | Aces Total | 489 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 690 | Total Double Faults | 205 |
| 1:22:11 | Average Match Time | 1:41:41 |
| 222.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.97 |
| 67% (9776/14507) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3943/6153) |
| 65% (6326/9776) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2794/3943) |
| 48% (2255/4731) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1168/2210) |
| 46% (801/1757) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (197/474) |
| 44% (6478/14781) | Return Points Win % | 36% (2148/6016) |
| 63% (166/262) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (43/85) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (32/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (15/40) |
| 51% (38/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 90% (165/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (43/38) |
| 10% (165/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (43/5) |
| 22% (102/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (44/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
